So what are the pros and cons of pixelated digital camouflage vs: traditional camouflage for hunting and combat? It is a very interesting topic and now Insider Monkey has published an article about it.What is camouflage? It is an integral part in both hunting and combat in the military, and it isn’t hard to see why. After all, if you are out hunting and the animal can easily spot you, it will run and hide, and you won’t be able to get a decent shot. This reduces your effectiveness and the chances of success in capturing the animal. Similarly, if you are in the army or the military, and you are engaged in combat, camouflage is important not just to enable you to sneak up on the enemy undetected and thus to have a much better chance of winning the battle, but also to prevent the enemy from spotting you easily which will give you the opportunity to attack first.
For snipers engaged in combat, camouflage is an absolute necessity. Of course, camouflage isn’t only used for people. In fact, camouflage is used for various military vehicles such as trucks and tanks which can also pass by undetected.
Now without a further ado let’s see what Insider Monkey has investigated for us. Determining a change is the first issue on this topic. As time passed by, the United States thought that there was a better way to attain camouflage other than the traditional way, and in 2004, they introduced the pixelated digital camouflage at a massive cost of over $5 billion. You might be wondering why exactly they wanted to improve on an already excellent idea. The thing is, for the United States, nothing is perfect enough. They believe that everything can be improved upon if you just keep throwing money at it. After all, a single camouflage design can only work in a specific period. What could be better than introducing a design which would work for all situations? The simple answer was that such a design did not work in a single environment and was universally criticized. This led to an entire revamping of the camouflage design.
For any further interesting information read Insider Monkey’s article about pixelated digital camouflage vs: traditional camouflage for hunting and combat.